Optimization of complex queries involving multiple joins and subqueries. These tests did not attempt to measure multi-user performance or
The results presented here come with the following caveats: SQLite works best if you group multiple operations together into But this is not seen as a problem because SQLite does not execute CREATE INDEX or DROP TABLE as fast as More than twice as fast) than MySQL 3.23.41 On RedHat 7.2 for most common operations. SQLite 2.7.6 is significantly faster (sometimes as much as 10 orĢ0 times faster) than the default PostgreSQL 7.1.3 installation SQLite 2.7.6, PostgreSQL 7.1.3, and MySQL 3.23.41.Ĭonclusions drawn from these experiments:
#SQLITE VS POSTGRESQL SERIES#
This page has been retained onlyĪ series of tests were run to measure the relative performance of
The numbers here have become meaningless. It describes a speed comparison betweenĪrchaic versions of SQLite, MySQL and PostgreSQL. That has saved us engineers lots of time that would have gone into Postgres administration.Note: This document is very very old. There's not much to configure, and the out of the box settings are quite sane. This is less significant, but Postgres is also quite easy to manage (unless you are going above and beyond to squeeze out every last bit of performance).In our 6 years of Postgres existence, we have not lost a byte of customer data due to Postgres messing up a transaction or during the multiple times the hard-drives failed (thanks to ACID compliance!). It provides incredibly trustworthy storage for wherever customer data dumped in.Sure, it's not easy for non-technical employees to psql in and view raw tables, but it has saved engineering hundreds of man-hours that would have had to be spent on building equivalent tools to serve finance or customer support. As I mentioned in the "Use Case" section, Postgres is not only used by engineering but also finance to measure how much to charge customers and customer support to debug customer issues. The user-role system has saved us tons of time and thus money.Lastly, if you are using this in an Andriod App development cycle then also your options are limited because it does not integrate with PostgreSQL and MYSQL.If you do require all those things then you are better off not using this software. The most common difficulty with this is the lack of some of the basic functionality which is present in the other premier databases like Joints, Stored Procedure calls, Security and permission grants.You really need to be forward thinking in a manner to predict if this database will cater to all the needs of your project. If your project involves multiple people working on the same database simultaneously, then that becomes a big problem, because it only allows single write at one time.Although it is excellent at what it does, you should be really careful and plan accordingly if you know that your database is going to scale at a huge level because it is not suitable of databases which are of Enterprise level and demands top-notch security and protection.OSS/BSS (Operations Support/Business Support).
Static Application Security Testing (SAST).Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).
#SQLITE VS POSTGRESQL PROFESSIONAL#
Professional Employer Organizations (PEO).
0 kommentar(er)
